CoN 1: Resolution 3

Background
Some members of the council felt it necessary to apply restrictions on council members whom were using their money to sway votes into their favor. Though it was unknown whether or not council members were using bribery to corrupt the resolutions, but it was important to bring up the problem.

Text of the Resolution
ON THE QUESTION OF BRIBERY IN THE COUNCIL

PROPSOED BY: Wilhelm Friedrich Simon, Syndic of Franconia

DIRECTED TOWARDS: Member states of the Council

VOTING PRECESSION:

Yea- The Council will not be able to enact any policy that provides monetary gain to fellow members of the council for the duration of a voting precession.

Nay- There will be no restrictions on any policies that provide monetary gain to fellow members of the council for the duration of a voting precession.

- Abstain

Official Vote
The Official Vote is as follows;

Yea: 3

Nay: 3

Abstain: 1 Final Verdict: No action taken towards deciding the legitimacy of bribery in the council during voting.

Aftermath
It is highly probable that future resolutions had some votes bought out by the powers of the council. Highly susceptible countries like Brandenburg and Aragon being the most likely to have been bought.